PA Remains Ranked #15 Bicycle Friendly State

Yesterday the League of American Bicyclists announced their Bicycle Friendly States ranking for 2013.  Pennsylvania ranked 15th, unchanged from 2012.

The LAB “Report Card” for PA contains many good recommendations for how Pennsylvania could improve its ranking. The top three are similar to what we have been asking the legislature to address as it moves forward on a state level transportation bill. 

  1. Create an adequately staffed Bike/Ped Office or Program within PennDOT to administer a competitive grant fund program and coordinate implementation of bike/ped programs within PennDOT and its district offices .
  2. Establish a competitive grant program and bicycle/pedestrian maintenance fund with an annual appropriation of $20 million from the motor vehicle license fund .
  3. Repeal the policy requiring municipalities to accept maintenance and liability responsibilities for bicycle facilities that are placed on state roads within their jurisdictions.
  4. Adopt a vulnerable road user law that increases penalties for a motorist that injures or kills a bicyclist or pedestrian.

  1. Adopt a statewide, all-ages cell phone ban to combat distracted driving and increase safety for everyone.
  2. Collect data regarding enforcement actions against motorists based on incidents with bicycles, such as traffic tickets issued, prosecutions, or convictions.
  3. Adopt performance measures, such as mode shift or a low percentage of exempted projects, to better track and support Bike Accommodation Policy compliance.
  4. Revamp the Complete Streets checklist into an authentic Complete Streets policy that is transparent and accountable.
  5. Conduct a share the road campaign creatively addressing the issues specific to your state.
  6. Conduct a bicycle economic benefit study to showcase the positive impacts of bicycling for health costs, economic development, job creation, and transportation return on investment.
The LAB press release is here.
Posted in News | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Transportation Funding Policy Statements

Pennsylvania Walks and Bikes is an active voice in Harrisburg during the debate over transportation funding.  Our efforts have brought bike and ped issues to the table, but we can’t do it alone.  Please take these documents and send a letter to your representatives.  If you are member of a club or group, consider having them do the same.

It is only through the collective efforts of us all that we can truly reshape the landscape of Pennsylvania’s transportation infrastructure.  Take a few minutes and send a letter to your rep!

Promoting Biking and Walking in Pennsylvania

Bike/Ped Office and Director Description of Duties

Why PA needs to eliminate the Bicycle Occupancy Permit

Posted in Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

PA Walks and Bikes Transportation Funding Policy Asks

Even though bicycling and walking make up 12% of trips in Pennsylvania, and bicyclists and pedestrians make up 11% of the fatalities statewide, Pennsylvania only spends 1.5% of its transportation budget on biking and walking projects and that 1.5% is derived fully from federal funds. PennDOT does not devote any state funds specifically to bicycling and walking projects.

More and more communities in Pennsylvania want to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities on their roads, but the Commonwealth lacks the funding to support planning, installation and maintenance of bike lanes, wider shoulders, road markings, bicycle route signage and sidewalks. Biking and walking are important modes of transportation that deserve support and accommodation as part of Pennsylvania’s comprehensive transportation system.

There are three important opportunities for Pennsylvania to support communities that want to make bicycling and walking safer. First, create a bicycling and walking office or section within PennDOT. Second, make biking and walking a substantive component of the multi-modal fund. Third, eliminate policies that are an obstacle to the placement of bicycle facilities on state roads.

  1. Create a Bicycle Pedestrian Office within PennDOT. Within PennDOT, there is no section, office or division devoted to biking and walking. PennDOT does not devote a full time bicycle-pedestrian coordinator (in one person) to overseeing the state’s biking and walking programs and policies. Without an expert on bicycle pedestrian issues on PennDOT’s executive team, these modes are easily neglected. While some District PennDOT offices have employees designated as bicycle/pedestrian coordinators, their job is to review project proposals to determine if they meet the minimum requirements for accommodating biking and walking. They offer little coordination and do not substantively interact with municipalities or counties to help them improve or plan for bicycling and walking in their communities.
  2. Ensure that the new multi-modal fund allocates sufficient funds to bicycle and walking projects. Providing an opportunity for municipalities and counties to apply for planning, design and construction funds for biking and walking projects would provide concentrated resources towards transportation modes that have long suffered from underfunding.
  3. Eliminate the Bicycle Occupancy Permit. Currently, state law requires local authorities to obtain approval from PennDOT in order for a bicycle marking or sign to be installed on a state road. Consequently, PennDOT requires local authorities to assume all maintenance and liability responsibility for bicycle markings and signs and obtain a Bicycle Occupancy Permit (BOP) if a bicycle facility is added to a state road within the municipality. The BOP is not required in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh, and between them, they have over 400 miles of bike lanes. In the rest of the state, where the BOP is required, less than 50 exist. Bicycle markings and signs should not trigger PennDOT approval and local authorities should not be required to obtain a BOP from PennDOT in order to have bicycle markings or signs installed on state roads within their jurisdictions.
PA Walks and Bikes has joined with the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia, Lebanon Valley Bicycle Coalition, Mission Readiness, Centre Region Bicycle Coalition, Rails to Trails, and Bike Pittsburgh to make our law makers aware of these policies during the debate over transportation funding.
Posted in Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Big Takeaway from Last Week’s National Bike Summit

Last week’s National Bicycle Summit, an annual confab organized by the League of American Bicyclists, was an invigorating and innovative three days in Washington D.C. As reported in earlier posts, the Summit featured the terrific National Women’s Bicycle Forum on Monday. We heard keynote addresses from Georgena Terry, Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth, and NYC Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan. (Click those links for videos of their addresses.) Tuesday’s speakers included beloved and departing DOT Commissioner Ray LaHood, Bruce Katz from the Brookings Institute, and Indianapolis mayor Greg Ballard.

Tuesday also featured one of the most interesting parts of the summit, the presentation from Doug Meyer, of Bernuth & Williamson Consulting. Mr. Meyer was hired by the League to interview 30 Republican and Democratic hill staffers to get a sense of which messages delivered by the biking and walking community best resonate. You can read a summary of Mr. Meyer’s findings here and his presentation here. Some of the key findings of his presentation:

  • Bicycle advocates as “sore winners”  (MAP-21 should be considered a win, not a loss, given that all funding was slated to be eliminated and we were able to save it.)
  • Dedicated funding is not the be all, end all (The trend is for funding to be directed to MPOs and localities.)
  • The future is a multi-modal transportation system; embrace it and use it(Frame biking as a key cog in a larger multi-modal transportation system.)
  • Asking for a “fair share for safety” doesn’t resonate (Asking for safer streets through performance measures — or a national goal — is far more compelling than asking for money.)

As reported by Bike Portland, the bicycle movement is evolving and the advocacy community needs to evolve with it.

A big takeaway from Meyer’s research (and the Summit overall) is that bicycling should no longer be considered a fringe activity. From the huge positive impact of bike-sharing and the proliferation of protected bikeways in U.S. cities; to US DOT Secretary Ray LaHood’s efforts to legitimize non-motorized transportation — the national profile of cycling has never been higher. That means advocates must shift their frame-of-reference.  “Bicycling advocates now have a seat at the table,” said Meyer during an interview on Wednesday, “So instead of convincing people that they need that seat, now they need to sit down and start working together on solutions.”

On Wednesday, despite a federal government shut-down (by a storm that ultimately skipped DC), we joined other PA residents in trooping through the rain to visit with members of Congress and their staff (those whos offices remained open through what turned out to be little snow and much rain). A big thank you to everyone who took the time to come down to DC to deliver the message that Bicycling Means Business, especially in Pennsylvania!

Pat Cunnane (Advanced Sports) & Joe Staffor (Bicycle Access Council) greeted Rep. Scott Perry (PA -09) on his way to a vote

Rep. Jim Gerlach (PA-06) took time out of a Ways and Means Committee hearing to meet with Shayne Trimbell and Joe Lison

 

Bucks County residents Gunnar Bergy, Jennifer Polo, Scott Wueschinski, Andy Hamilton and Steve Hawkins were warmly greeted by Rep. Fitzpatrick (PA-08)

Posted in around the state | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Pennsylvania Needs A Responsible & Comprehensive Solution For Transportation Funding

By Hans van Naerssen, Chair, Pennsylvania Walks and Bikes

February 2013

Pennsylvanians deserve to travel safely whether they drive a car, take a bus or train, ride a bike or walk.  And no matter how one travels to and from work, shopping or appointments, everyone uses the same bridges and roads and should be able to use them without worrying about their safety and about getting to where they are going without undue delays.  But, worry they must because the Commonwealth’s transportation network is in crisis after years of insufficient investment.

With 25,000 bridges that are on average, 50 years old, Pennsylvania’s 4774 structurally deficient bridges place the state first in the nation with bridges in need of repair.   There is also a backlog in the repaving and reconstruction of the 121,000-mile state road system, as anyone who has been our roads can confirm.

Compounding the degraded state of the state’s roads and bridges, Pennsylvania’s Department of Transportation forecasts that congestion is worsening.  The total number of hours that vehicles are delayed will increase by 48 percent by 2030, due to the increase in miles driven by motor vehicles (27 percent) and miles driven by trucks (47 percent) over the same period.  Congestion isn’t just annoying, it’s expensive; it drains $2.7 billion out of the Pennsylvanians economy each year.

As bad as congestion is, getting killed or injured on the state’s roads is much more serious.  In 2010, there were 121,312 reportable traffic crashes in Pennsylvania.  These crashes claimed the lives of 1,324 and injured another 87,949.    Although these numbers are the lowest since the 1950s, it doesn’t dull the fact that someone in Pennsylvania is killed in a motor vehicle crash every seven hours.  But, safety is not only a public health issue. It’s also an economic one.  In 2008, Pennsylvania crashes and fatalities resulted in economic losses totaling an estimated $15.4 billion, or $926 for every person in Pennsylvania.

Additionally, the state is suffering another public health crisis related to transportation.  Currently, 28.6 percent of adults in Pennsylvania are considered obese.  At the current trajectory, 56.7 percent of Pennsylvania adults will be obese by 2030.  Even more alarming is that child obesity rates have more than tripled in the last 30 years.  Forty percent of Pennsylvania’s young adults are considered overweight or obese.  Walking, jogging or biking 30 minutes a day can dramatically improve one’s health.  But kids and adults need safe sidewalks, intersections and comfortable streets before they make walking or biking to school, work or for errands part of their daily life.

Building more roads isn’t going help reduce the severity of these problems.  Only maintaining and repairing the state’s transportation network and enhancing it with multiple transportation options is going produce positive results.  Public health, public safety and congestion illustrate how interrelated different modes of transportation are and that a comprehensive solution to funding all modes of travel is essential.

Due to increasing vehicle fuel efficiency, Pennsylvania now collects less fuel tax revenue per mile traveled than it has at any time in the past.  There is much less state money available to be spent on improvements to the transportation system, leading to a growing funding gap.

Compounding the decline in funding availability is the steady increase in construction costs.  In 2010, the Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee calculated that the annual funding gap, which was $1.7 billion in 2006, had grown to $3.5 billion.  The cost of not fixing the problem grows by about $1 million every day that the problem is not fixed.  By 2020, that gap could double to $7.2 billion.

Although some insist that today’s tax rates should not increase, that short sighted view ignores the fact that Pennsylvanians already paying dearly for congestion, crashes that result in fatalities and injuries and  increased public health costs.  By putting off maintenance, repair and investment in our state’s transportation infrastructure, we end up paying other costs instead and are handing a tax burden to our children.

Governor Corbett’s proposal this week has been eagerly awaited by all transportation sectors, including the biking and walking community.  We think it is a good starting point to help resolve the Commonwealth’s transportation funding crisis.  We look forward to the State Legislature working with Governor Corbett to pass a comprehensive bill that addresses safety and congestion to turn around Pennsylvania’s transportation crisis.

Posted in Policy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment